It would be ignorant to ignore this work, castigate the author, or feel complacent with the direction of modern science until you-ve identified a point of flawed reasoning.  Let it be known: up until this point in time, no-one, not from CERN, MIT, UNM, or NASA, has been able to find a true flaw with the science of this model. 

If the reader chooses the -wildly unlikely- second clause of any of those questions-then what?

This new model presents new explanation for many formerly unexplainable anomalies of nature: black-holes, dark matter, a flat event horizon, the driving mechanism of the solar wind, the uniform distribution of galaxies, and many more.  Also, the implications of this model point toward dire concerns regarding the imminent start-up of the machine, known as, LHC.  If these implications are correct, then we are all in very grave danger.

Of the initial questions posed, the first clauses seem the most likely-doomsday theorists are nothing new.  The last question concerning new scientific research cannot be so easily discarded.  New exploration always carries a degree of risk and uncertainty.  What would be the point of looking if you already had the answer?  Explorers have always put their lives on the line and suffered from their own mistakes: the Curies exposed themselves to radiation and died prematurely, artic explorers froze in the tundra, and early alchemists blew themselves to pieces.  Past mistakes of the explorer had repercussions and risks only for those in immediate proximity.  For LHC, the potential risk spreads to every current and future human and life-form of this planet.  If that experiment goes amiss, as is implied by this model, then everything could be destroyed.

After completing this work, the author was made aware that there exists websites that attempt to warn (or assuage fears) concerning LHC.  Two groups, Lifeboat and LHCdefense, appear to be actively trying to prevent the start-up of LHC.  The CERN website possesses multiple assurances that LHC, and the black-holes it is designed to produce, are going to be perfectly harmless.  The reader should be aware of these preexisting sites in order to come to the most educated conclusions possible.  Regardless of what might be posted by others, the Dominium model stands alone and is complete on its own.

By reading this book, or even just this introductory description, the reader is presented with many unpalatable questions.  Do you read on and eventually act to do your part to save the planet; or will you skip and ignore this work, choosing to cling to the belief that there is no problem worth your concern?  Your actions could shift the balance-regardless of how you choose.  The next question becomes: which way will the balance shift because of you?